Comments: Obverse 2, in its final die state, is paired with a shattered reverse die from 1877. 1877-CC Type II Reverse A had already been paired with at least two obverse dies in 1877. During the pairing with Obverse 8, the die is severely cracked. Ahwash speculates that the reverse die shattered, taking away the lower left ribbon and part of the bottom of the left maple leaf. After studying the 1877-CC Type II Variety 110 coin and this 1878-CC shattered reverse coin side by side, I believe that this die was severely polished or lapped throughout its face to produce the remaining coinage needed in 1878. There is reduction in details throughout this die, not only in the lower left wreath area. A shattering or cracking of the die in the lower wreath would have produced retained metal, instead we find a smooth polish surface with little device details in the lower left wreath. Please check 1878-CC Variety 102 and 103. Both Reverse B and C also exhibit similar weakness in the lower left wreath and left ribbon area. I suspect that all three Type II reverse dies may have been left over from 1877 and were polished or lapped before being put into service for 1878 coinage. Unfortunately, I have not been able to match 1878-CC Reverse B or Reverse C with a reverse die from 1877. This will be left up to the future researchers of this series.

Copyrighted 2004 By Gerry Fortin, All Rights Reserved |  Legal Disclosure | Email