Comments: The Medium S mintmark on Reverse J exhibits a strong right tilt. There is an artifact in the upper loop of the Medium S. The artifact in the upper loop of the Medium S mintmark has been designated as the remnants of a Small S mintmark in the Cherrypicker's Guide by Bill Fivaz and J.T. Stanton. After close examination of the Medium S mintmark on several examples of Variety 111, I am not completely convinced that this variety is a Medium S over Small S mintmark. The lower loop of the Medium S does not show any evidence or remnants of a Small S mintmark. During earlier years, Seated dimes from the San Francisco mint have exhibited Medium S mintmarks with a punch defect in the upper loop. Until I see an example of Variety 111 with both the upper and lower loops of the Small S mintmark visible under the Medium S, there will be uncertainty in my mind as to the accuracy of the Medium S over Small S mintmark designation.

1890s Varieties 101, 101a, 102, 103, 103a, 104, 105, 106, 106a, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 114a, 115, 116, 117

Back to 1890s Varieties Table

Back to Date and Mintmark Table