|
1875-CC
CC Below Wreath
Mintage: 4,645,000 (both In and Below Wreath)
Var# |
Obv |
Rev |
DR |
|
Obverse / Reverse Quick Diagnostics |
Ahwash |
Greer |
|
|
1.2 |
A |
1L |
|
Medium Level Date / Small CC, [mm Lt,C,TL2] |
A-3 |
|
|
|
2 |
A |
1C |
|
High Date, Downward Slope / Small CC, [mm Lt,C,TL2] |
A-4 |
|
|
* |
2.2 |
A |
1C |
|
Die Cracks, High Date, Downward Slope / Small CC, [mm Lt,C,TL2] |
|
|
|
|
3 |
B.2 |
1L |
|
High Level Date, Die Cracks / [mm Lt,C,TL2], Bold Rim Cud 5:30 - 6:30 |
|
|
|
3 |
B.3 |
1L |
|
High Level Date, Die Cracks / [mm Lt,C,TL2], Rim Cud 4:30 - 8:00 |
||||
|
4 |
C |
0C |
|
LDS, High Date, Downward Slope / [mm Lt,L], Vertical Die Polish Line |
|
|
|
|
4 |
B |
0C |
|
LDS, High Date, Downward Slope / Small CC, [mm C,L,TL2] |
|
|
|
|
5 |
C |
0R |
|
Medium Date, Sl. Down Slope / Small CC, [mm Lt,L] |
|
|
|
|
5 |
C.2 |
0R |
|
Medium Date, Sl. Down Slope / Cracked Die, Rim Cud Below Mintmark |
|
|
|
5 |
C.3 |
0R |
|
Medium Date, Sl. Down Slope /Massive Retained Cud Rim To Right Wreath |
||||
|
6 |
D.2 |
0R |
|
High Date, Down Slope, DCr Through Date / Cracked Die, [mm Lt,L,TL3] |
|
|
|
|
6.2 |
D.2 |
0R |
|
Die Cud Below Date / Cracked Die, [mm Lt,L,TL3] |
|
|
|
7 |
E |
1R |
|
High Date, Sl. Downward Slope / Small CC, [mm Lt,L,TL2] |
||||
7 |
E.2 |
1R |
|
High Date, Sl. Downward Slope / Rim Cud 5:30-7:00, Die Cracks |
||||
7.2 |
F |
1R |
|
LDS, High Date, Sl. Down Slope / Sm CC, [mm Lt,L], Rim Cud at 12:00 |
||||
7.2 |
G |
1R |
|
LDS, High Date, Sl. Down Slope / Sm CC, [mm Lt,L,TL1], Cracked Die |
||||
1 |
B |
1L |
|
Medium Level Date / Sm CC, [mm C,L,TL2] |
||||
3.2 |
D |
1L |
|
Die Cud Below Date / Small CC, Early Die State |
||||
8 |
D |
1C |
|
Medium Level Date, DCr OF AMERICA / Small CC, Early Die State |
||||
7.3 |
H |
1R |
|
LDS, DCr Through STATES/ Small CC, [mm Lt,L], Lazy I in DIME |
Variety Vs. Denticle Ruler Cross Reference Table Reverse Die and Mintmark Position Comparison Guide Scarcity: A common date in the lower circulated grades but still more difficult to locate than the In Wreath variety. This variety becomes scarce in EF and rare in Mint State. Updated Greer Rarity Ratings Rarity Rating Below Wreath: G-VG R2+, F-VF R2+, EF-AU R3+, MS R5 Overall Rarity: G-VG R1, F-VF R2, EF-AU R2+, MS R3 Fortin Variety Rarity Estimates In VF - Mint State
Variety |
Rarity |
Variety |
Rarity |
||
R3 |
- |
R5 |
- |
||
R3 |
- |
R6 |
400-600% |
||
R3 |
- |
R3 |
- |
||
R4 |
- |
R5 |
100-150% |
||
R3 |
- |
R4 |
- |
||
R3 |
- |
R4 |
- |
||
R3 |
- |
R4 |
- |
||
R3 |
- |
R6+ |
400-600% |
||
R4 |
- |
R4 |
- |
||
R6 |
400-600% |
R5 |
- |
Comments: Multiple obverse and reverse die marriages have been identified for dies used to strike both the Carson City In Wreath and Below Wreath varieties. I have reported obverse die pairings between In Wreath and Below Wreath reverse dies in this chapter. Strike weakness is common for the head area and near the reverse rims. Rim cuds are encountered for both In Wreath and Below Wreath dimes. Serious assessment of the rarities of the individual Below Wreath varieties is a task left to another Seated dime specialist. I have provided my best estimates of variety rarities but more research is needed in this area. Value As A Date (Coin World Trends/CoinValues
Grade |
1963 |
1973 |
1983 |
1993 |
2003 |
2012 |
G |
1.5 |
2.25 |
6.25 |
6 |
20 |
30 |
F |
3 |
4.5 |
20 |
15 |
30 |
35 |
EF |
- |
12.5 |
60 |
33 |
75 |
125 |
MS60 |
15 |
90 |
235 |
220 |
300 |
400 |
MS63 |
- |
- |
- |
485 |
1000 |
1250 |
Back to Date and Mintmark Table