|
1852
Mintage: 1,535,500 Proofs: Possibly 8 (Breen)
Var# |
Obv |
Rev |
DR |
|
Obverse / Reverse Quick Diagnostics |
Ahwash |
Greer |
|
|
1 |
A |
0R |
|
18 Touch Base, Very High Date, Down Slope / Die Lines (STATES OF) |
A-1 |
|
|
|
2 |
B |
-1B0 |
|
Repunched 1, Medium Level Date / Faint Die Crack Tops of A(MERICA) |
A-2 |
G102 |
|
2.2 |
B.2 |
-1B0 |
|
Weak Repunched 1 / Bold Die Crack Tops of A(MERICA) |
|
|
||
|
3 |
C |
-1C |
|
High Date, Downward Slope, Closed 5 / Die Lines (ST)ATES To Wreath |
A-3 |
|
|
|
4 |
D |
-1R |
|
Repunched 52, High Level Date / Weak Legend, DCr Rim to (A)MERICA |
|
|
|
* |
4.2 |
E |
-1R |
|
Repunched 52, Die Cracks / Multiple Die Cracks |
A-4 |
G101 |
|
|
4.2 |
E.2 |
-1R |
|
Repunched 52, Die Cracks / Partial Reverse Cud At UNIT(ED S)TATES |
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
E.3 |
-1R |
|
Repunched 52, Die Cracks / Retained Reverse Cud At UNIT(ED S)TATES |
|
|
|
|
5 |
F |
-1R |
|
High Date, Downward Slope, Die Cracks Top Of Head / Bold Perfect Die |
|
|
|
|
5 |
G |
-1R |
|
High Date, Downward Slope, Die Cracks / Weak and Cracked Reverse |
|
|
|
|
6 |
H |
0L |
|
Oblique Date Punch, Faint DCr Left of Rock / Die Defect DI(M)E |
|
|
|
6.2 |
H.2 |
0L |
|
Heavy DCr Left of Rock, High Level Date / Die Crack A(MERI)CA |
||||
|
7 |
I |
0C |
|
Rim Cud Stars 10-12, High Level Date / Die Crack Rim to STATE(S) |
|
|
|
|
8 |
J |
-1B0 |
|
High Level Date, Die Lines Thru Lower Left Arm / Perfect Die |
|
|
|
|
8.2 |
J.2 |
-1B0 |
|
Die Crack Bottom of Date, Interim Die State / Lightly Cracked Die |
|
|
|
8.3 |
J.2 |
-1B0 |
|
Severe Die Crack At Bottom of Date / Lightly Cracked Die |
||||
8.4 |
J.2 |
-1B0 |
|
Retained Cud,Severe Die Crack Bottom of Date / Lightly Cracked Die |
||||
|
9 |
K |
0L |
|
High Level Date, Die Lines Below Date / DCr STA(TES) (OF) A(MERICA) |
|
|
|
|
10 |
L |
0L |
|
High Level Date, Weak Shield, Closed 5 / Horizontal Die Crack DIME |
|
|
|
|
10a |
L |
0L |
|
Depression At Lower Shield, High Level Date / Horizontal Die Crack |
|
|
|
10 |
L.2 |
0L |
|
High Level Date / Partial Cud at (UNIT)ED, Horizontal Die Crack |
||||
|
11 |
M |
-1B0 |
|
Proof Die, High Level Date / Proof Die |
|
|
|
12 |
N |
-1L |
|
Date Furthest Left, High Date, Downward Slope / Perfect Die |
||||
13 |
O |
0L |
|
Shattered Die at Stars 10 - 13 / Die Cracks |
||||
1 |
P |
0R |
18 Touch Base, Very High Date, Downward Slope / DCr Tops of (UN)ITED | |||||
4.2 |
Q |
-1R |
Repunched 52, Die Cracks / Defects at (S)TATES AME(R)ICA | |||||
14 |
R |
-1B0 |
Rim Cud Star 1, High Date / Cracked Reverse, Ribbon End & A(MERICA) | |||||
12 |
P |
-1L |
Peripheral Erosion, Date Furthest Left / Cud at Tops of (UNI)TED |
Variety Vs. Denticle Ruler Cross Reference Table Scarcity: This date is generally available in the lower circulated grades, but becomes semi-scarce in EF or better. In grades of EF or better, 1852 dimes are easier to locate than the tougher 1851 date. Updated Greer Rarity Ratings Overall Rarity: G-VG R1, F-VF R2, EF-AU R3, MS R4- Fortin Variety Rarity Estimates In VF - Mint State
Variety |
Rarity |
Variety |
Rarity |
||
R3 |
- |
R5+ |
50-100% |
||
R4 |
- |
R7 |
500-700% |
||
R3 |
- |
R7+ |
600-800% |
||
R3 |
- |
R4 |
- |
||
R5 |
50-100% |
R3 |
- |
||
R3 |
- |
R7 |
50-100% |
||
R5 |
50-100% |
R6 |
50-100% |
||
R6 |
100-200% |
R8 |
- |
||
R3 |
- |
R4 |
- |
||
R3 |
- |
R5 |
50-100% |
||
R3 |
- |
R3 |
- |
||
R5 |
- |
R5 |
30-50% |
||
R4 |
30-50% |
R6 |
50-100% |
||
R3 |
- |
R7 |
50-100% |
Comments: 1852 dimes are typically well struck. Many examples can be found with obverse and reverse die cracks suggesting high striking force during the minting process or possibly, the extended usage of dies. Another consideration could be weak die steel since at least two varieties are known with full cuds. Variety 110a is example of full cud. With twelve business strike obverse dies identified, the average mintage per die is a reasonable 128,000 and does not explain the amount of cracked dies. I believe that certain dies saw higher production runs that others. Obverse 1 (18 Touches Base) and Obverse 4 (Repunched 52) are two examples. Ahwash suggested that "this date is rarer in all grades than its mintage would suggest" as a result of melting due to the high price of silver at the time. However, Greer indicates that "the melting has not impacted dimes nearly as much as the larger coins." The author agrees with Greer as 1852 dimes appears as frequently as 1845 dimes, a date with a similar mintage. Value As A Date (Coin World Trends/CoinValues
Grade |
1963 |
1973 |
1983 |
1993 |
2003 |
2012 |
G |
1.5 |
2.5 |
6 |
5.5 |
20 |
18 |
F |
3.5 |
4.75 |
15 |
12.75 |
30 |
22 |
EF |
- |
15 |
55 |
35 |
50 |
50 |
MS60 |
17.5 |
110 |
355 |
230 |
300 |
300 |
MS63 |
- |
- |
- |
765 |
800 |
750 |
Back to Date and Mintmark Table