|
1852

Mintage: 1,535,500 Proofs: Possibly 8 (Breen)
|
Var# |
Obv |
Rev |
DR |
|
Obverse / Reverse Quick Diagnostics |
Ahwash |
Greer |
|
|
|
1 |
A |
0R |
|
18 Touch Base, Very High Date, Downward Slope, Open 5 / Clashed Die |
A-1 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
B |
-1B0 |
|
Repunched 1, Medium Level Date, Closed 5 / DCr Tops of A(MERICA) |
A-2 |
G102 |
|
|
|
3 |
C |
-1C |
|
High Date, Downward Slope, Closed 5 / Die Lines (ST)ATES To Wreath |
A-3 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
D |
-1R |
|
Repunched 52, High Level Date / Die Crack Rim to (A)MERICA, DD DI(M)E |
|
|
|
|
* |
4.2 |
E |
-1R |
|
Repunched 52, Die Cracks / Multiple Die Cracks |
A-4 |
G101 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
E.2 |
-1R |
|
Repunched 52, Die Cracks / Partial Reverse Cud At UNIT(ED S)TATES |
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
E.3 |
-1R |
|
Repunched 52, Die Cracks / Retained Reverse Cud At UNIT(ED S)TATES |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
F |
-1R |
|
High Date, Downward Slope, Die Cracks Top Of Head / Bold Perfect Die |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
G |
-1R |
|
High Date, Downward Slope, Die Cracks / Weak and Cracked Reverse |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
H |
0C |
|
High Level Date, Open 5, Heavy DC Left of Rock / DC A(MERI)CA |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
D |
0L |
|
High Level Date, Die Crack Stars 9 and 10 to Rim / Die Defect DI(M)E |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
I |
-1B0 |
|
High Level Date, Potential Misplaced 2 Punch In Gown / Perfect Die |
|
|
|
|
|
8.2 |
I |
-1B0 |
|
Severe Die Crack At Bottom of Date / Perfect Die |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
J |
0L |
|
High Level Date, Die Lines Below Date / DCr STA(TES) (OF) A(MERICA) |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
K |
0L |
|
High Level Date, Weak Shield, Closed 5 / Horizontal Bisecting Die Cr. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
K |
0L |
|
Depression At Lower Shield, High Level Date / Horizontal Die Crack |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
L |
-1B0 |
|
Proof Die, High Level Date / Proof Die |
|
|
|
|
12 |
M |
-1L |
|
High Date, Downward Slope / Perfect Die |
||||
|
1 |
N |
0R |
18 Touch Base, Very High Date, Downward Slope / DCr Tops of (UN)ITED | |||||
|
4.2 |
O |
-1R |
Repunched 52, Die Cracks / Defects at (S)TATES AME(R)ICA |
Variety Vs. Denticle Ruler Cross Reference Table Scarcity: This date is generally available in the lower circulated grades, but becomes semi-scarce in EF or better. In grades of EF or better, 1852 dimes are easier to locate than the tougher 1851 date. Updated Greer Rarity Ratings Overall Rarity: G-VG R1, F-VF R2, EF-AU R3, MS R4- Fortin Variety Rarity Estimates In VF - Mint State
| Variety |
Rarity |
Variety |
Rarity |
||
|
R2 |
- |
R4 |
- |
||
|
R3 |
- |
R3 |
- |
||
|
R3 |
- |
R6 |
300-500% |
||
|
R5 |
50-100% |
R4 |
- |
||
|
R3 |
- |
R3 |
- |
||
|
R4 |
50-100% |
R6 |
100-200% |
||
|
R5 |
100-200% |
R8 |
- |
||
|
R3 |
- |
R4 |
- |
||
|
R3 |
- |
R3 |
- |
||
|
R4 |
- |
R5 |
50-100% |
Comments: 1852 dimes are typically well struck. Many examples can be found with obverse and reverse die cracks suggesting high striking force during the minting process or possibly extended usage of dies. Another consideration could be weak die steel since at least one variety is known with a full cud and possibly a second, Variety 110a. With eleven business strike obverse dies identified to date, the average mintage per die is a reasonable 127,500. It has been suggested by Ahwash that "this date is rarer in all grades than its mintage would suggest" as a result of melting due to the high price of silver at the time. Greer indicates that "the melting has not impacted dimes nearly as much as the larger coins." The author agrees with Greer as 1852 dimes appears as frequently as 1845 dimes, a date with a similar mintage. Value As A Date (Coin World Trends/CoinValues)
| Grade |
1963 |
1973 |
1983 |
1993 |
2003 |
2010 |
|
G |
1.5 |
2.5 |
6 |
5.5 |
20 |
20 |
|
F |
3.5 |
4.75 |
15 |
12.75 |
30 |
30 |
|
EF |
- |
15 |
55 |
35 |
50 |
50 |
|
MS60 |
17.5 |
110 |
355 |
230 |
300 |
350 |
|
MS63 |
- |
- |
- |
765 |
800 |
750 |
Back to Date and Mintmark Table
| Copyrighted 2004-2012 By Gerry Fortin, All Rights Reserved | Legal Disclosure | Email |